Friday, April 15, 2011

Owners Call for a New Age Of Prefabrication

By Richard Korman

Leaders of the Construction Users Roundtable say they want to push designers and contractors to use more sophisticated methods of prefabrication and modular construction techniques to cut the time and cost of construction and to complete projects more safely with fewer workers.

The comments were made at CURT's spring meeting April 12-13 in Covington, Ky., outside Cincinnati.

While the use of prefabrication techniques has accelerated in the last five years—companies such as Jacobs Engineering, The Shaw Group Inc. and Cianbro are making advances— most of the rest of the industry doesn't plan prefabrication imaginatively enough.

"Right now, we're taking stickbuilidng from the field and putting it in a shop," says Robert Volkman, a CURT project coordinator and former associate director for global construction management with Procter and Gamble.

Volkman says prefabrication and modular construction techniques are important in order to complete projects with fewer workers. "It's essential to overcome our workforce shortage," he says. The shortage will become acute again as the slow climb out of recession continues, he says. "We now have to do it with less labor."

Prefabrication and shop fabrication also allow work to be completed more safely, says Michael G. Conley, construction and project controls competency leader for Dupont Engineering and the current president of CURT.

Over the decades, modular and shop-assembled construction has been used to build homes, schools, prisons and large process plants.

Dupont has used prefabrication for pipe bridges and currently has a push on to apply prefabrication to larger segmented steel sub-assemblies, says Conley.

The distances over which prefabricated assemblies and modules can be economically shipped to jobsites has also increased, say Volkman and Conley.



  2. the new age of pre-fab is for but one reason, to avoid Contractual CBA obligations & do the owrk offsite with a Non-Union or Alter-Ego/Double Breasted firm.

    Guess it's time to offshore the Architectural & Engineering work too and save of those enourmous design fees. You never see the A/E, or CM's cutting any costs, they in fact pay very handsomely, while most have zero Liability as compared to the GC's & Sub's - to which the A/E & CM always attempt tp lay blame when theri designs fail to meet applicable Code requirements etc.


I would ask that if you would like to leave a comment that you think of Local 157 Blogspot as your online meeting hall and that you wouldn’t say anything on this site that you wouldn’t, say at a union meeting. Constructive criticism is welcome, as we all benefit from such advice. Obnoxious comments are not welcome.