Nowhere does the NLRA require an essay contest as one of two pre-requisite's to the right to Run for Union Office!
The NLRA also does not require any Rank & File member to get an arbitrary number of petitions signed in order to run.
Both requirements are clearly illegal and discriminatory! Quick, someone call the ACLU and file a 10(f) Petition in the District Court to stop this Train-wreck before it builds a head of steam.
Actions speak louder than words.
The ROMAC sessions have been full of false promises and false hope to the members - and you have not delivered.
It is quite clear that you openly support and act like Doug McCarron's paid spokesman - hardly in your job description now is it?
The Elections are just another diversionary tactic being employed to distract the Rank & File from your failure to submit one Motion in defense of their rights.
It is also quite clear that you & Torrance have been around for a long time and served as Junior Attorneys under that fraud of an ex-Judge, Kenneth Conboy, thus enabling the likes of Forde & Greaney, the prior and failed Restructuring Plan and the fraud & theft of member funds.
Who will decide the questions, and "Essay Board"?
Can members take a Journeyman upgrade Class in: "Answers Doug wants to Hear", "UBC Kool-Aid & Propaganda for Advanced Brown-Nosers", "The Contractors just want to be Loved" and "Blackballing dissidents via Economic Starvation".
Now we're going to get Rigged Essay Questions, Rigged Petition Lists and USAO & IRO supported discrimination blessed by a Federal Judge??
Did you buy your Bar Card on a street corner? This is coercion, intimidation, fraud and discrimination at is finest hour!
You have just locked out 99% of the potential candidates for office, thus ensuring that the hand-picked UBC Lapdogs (handpicked by McCarron) shall be the only people with a reasonable chance to win the EST, President & VP slots at the Council Elections.
Time to call in Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, the ACLU.
This is a real blunder on your part and it clearly discriminates against minorities and woman, and people with limited speaking or writing skills and it must be challeneged in Court.
If Judge Berman were smart - he would clean house right now & get rid of Conboy, Torrance and Walsh and start anew....fresh blood, people who actually take their sworn duty to uphold the Laws seriously!!
Rewarding failure with more of the same simply does not work.
All three of you have proven that fact time and again - and everyone of you were directly involved in the dismal failure of the Consent Decree over the majority of it's 17-year life.
Identify exactly where in the NLRA, LMRA or LMRDA, the condition precedent to a Union member Running for Elected Office has to sign an LCN Declaration, undergo a Background & Credit Check, write an Essay on an arbitrary and capricious question posed by the USAO or IRO, or the UBCJA International; and/or Petition Members via their signature and support simply to Run on a Ballot?
When Government seeks to use its full power, including the criminal law, to command where a person may get his or her information or what distrusted source he or she may not hear, it uses censorship to control thought. This is unlawful. The First Amendment confirms the freedom to think for ourselves.
I would ask that if you would like to leave a comment that you think of Local 157 Blogspot as your online meeting hall and that you wouldn’t say anything on this site that you wouldn’t, say at a union meeting. Constructive criticism is welcome, as we all benefit from such advice. Obnoxious comments are not welcome.
Essay this esse!
ReplyDeleteNowhere does the NLRA require an essay contest as one of two pre-requisite's to the right to Run for Union Office!
The NLRA also does not require any Rank & File member to get an arbitrary number of petitions signed in order to run.
Both requirements are clearly illegal and discriminatory! Quick, someone call the ACLU and file a 10(f) Petition in the District Court to stop this Train-wreck before it builds a head of steam.
Actions speak louder than words.
The ROMAC sessions have been full of false promises and false hope to the members - and you have not delivered.
It is quite clear that you openly support and act like Doug McCarron's paid spokesman - hardly in your job description now is it?
The Elections are just another diversionary tactic being employed to distract the Rank & File from your failure to submit one Motion in defense of their rights.
It is also quite clear that you & Torrance have been around for a long time and served as Junior Attorneys under that fraud of an ex-Judge, Kenneth Conboy, thus enabling the likes of Forde & Greaney, the prior and failed Restructuring Plan and the fraud & theft of member funds.
Who will decide the questions, and "Essay Board"?
Can members take a Journeyman upgrade Class in: "Answers Doug wants to Hear", "UBC Kool-Aid & Propaganda for Advanced Brown-Nosers", "The Contractors just want to be Loved" and "Blackballing dissidents via Economic Starvation".
Now we're going to get Rigged Essay Questions, Rigged Petition Lists and USAO & IRO supported discrimination blessed by a Federal Judge??
Did you buy your Bar Card on a street corner? This is coercion, intimidation, fraud and discrimination at is finest hour!
You have just locked out 99% of the potential candidates for office, thus ensuring that the hand-picked UBC Lapdogs (handpicked by McCarron) shall be the only people with a reasonable chance to win the EST, President & VP slots at the Council Elections.
Time to call in Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, the ACLU.
This is a real blunder on your part and it clearly discriminates against minorities and woman, and people with limited speaking or writing skills and it must be challeneged in Court.
If Judge Berman were smart - he would clean house right now & get rid of Conboy, Torrance and Walsh and start anew....fresh blood, people who actually take their sworn duty to uphold the Laws seriously!!
Rewarding failure with more of the same simply does not work.
All three of you have proven that fact time and again - and everyone of you were directly involved in the dismal failure of the Consent Decree over the majority of it's 17-year life.
Time for you to go!
Essay Number One:
ReplyDeleteIdentify exactly where in the NLRA, LMRA or LMRDA, the condition precedent to a Union member Running for Elected Office has to sign an LCN Declaration, undergo a Background & Credit Check, write an Essay on an arbitrary and capricious question posed by the USAO or IRO, or the UBCJA International; and/or Petition Members via their signature and support simply to Run on a Ballot?
100 Words or less, no open book or open notes!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1hnwvWhbJw&NR=1
ReplyDeleteAnimal House
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPfaEljlQ-8&NR=1
ReplyDeleteBELUSHI - LADDER SCENE
ZERO POINT ZERO
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yroKIGCtcwY&feature=related
When Government seeks to use its full power, including the criminal law, to command where a person may get his or her information or what distrusted source he or she may not hear, it uses censorship to control thought. This is unlawful. The First Amendment confirms the freedom to think for ourselves.
ReplyDeleteDennis - See you in Court!