tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3359799014847114554.post7788328023680572993..comments2024-03-28T03:17:03.641-04:00Comments on Local 157 blogspot: Order By Judge BermanJohn Musumecihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04779087011271278329noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3359799014847114554.post-38982562087096616212011-06-01T02:29:25.502-04:002011-06-01T02:29:25.502-04:00356 NLRB 121 - FRINGE BENEFIT FUNDS
Page 6, this b...356 NLRB 121 - FRINGE BENEFIT FUNDS<br />Page 6, this blog....the legal theory behind this decision is that it is a Violation of the NLRA to defraud CBA Contractual requirements to PAY BENEFITS, thus precluding corrupt Trust Fund Fiduciaires and Trustees from making concessions to the Fraud.<br /><br />De-frauding the Funds by the affixing of the EST, Fund Attorneys, Fiduciaries or Trustees signatures to a facially unlawful and seperate contract does not operate as a "waiver" to the NLRA, ERISA-EBSA etc. It does make a prima-facie case out for the exact date the above officals made the Illegal deal.<br />___________________________________<br />356 NLRB 121 IBEW Case 3-31-11<br />excerpt:<br />___________________________________<br /><br />In addition, the Respondents shall make the unit employees whole by making all fringe benefit payments that have not been made since October 21, 2009, and that would have been made but for the Respondents’ unlawful failure to make them, including any additional amounts applicable to such delinquent payments as set <br />forth in Merryweather Optical Co., 240 NLRB 1213, 1216 (1979).4 The Respondents shall also reimburse unit employees for any expenses ensuing from their failure to <br />make the required payments to the fringe benefit funds, as set forth in Kraft Plumbing & Heating, 252 NLRB 891, 891 fn. 2 (1980), enfd. mem. 661 F.2d 940 (9th Cir. 1981), such amounts to be computed in the manner set forth in Ogle Protection Service, supra, with interest as prescribed in New Horizons for the Retarded, supra, <br />compounded daily as prescribed in Kentucky River Medical <br />Center, supra. <br /><br />___________________________________<br />RO Walsh and/or UBC rank & file members can file NLRB charges against Employers who fail to make contributions to the Benefit Funds, as was done here in this alter-ego (double breasted) IBEW case from March 31, 2011 by the NLRB Board. <br /><br />So, who holds the Master list of which NYCDCC Signatory UBCJA GC's & Sub's are delinquent in this regard? How much does each firm owe? Why not get the list & the dollar amounts and file the charges at the NLRB? <br /><br />Force the DOL to do their job and to address this issue! RO Walsh should take the lead. Per Sup. Ct. precedent, irrespective of what action the Fund Attorneys are or are not taking - the NLRB charges can proceed concurrent to the Funds.<br />___________________________________<br /><br />NOTE: ALL CANDIDATES FOR TRUSTEE POSITIONS SHOULD KNOW THIS & SIMILAR CASES AT THE NLRB. <br /><br />TedAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3359799014847114554.post-62251594147382814442011-05-30T20:34:54.500-04:002011-05-30T20:34:54.500-04:003. Known "threats to the continued vitality a...3. Known "threats to the continued vitality and integrity of the [F]unds" (Tr., dated Apr. 6,2011, at 21 :21-23);<br /><br />I wonder if anyone will list the UBC and Frank Spencer as direct threats to the fundsRichard Dorroughnoreply@blogger.com