tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3359799014847114554.post5237844023171054113..comments2024-03-28T03:17:03.641-04:00Comments on Local 157 blogspot: STEWARD REVIEW OPERATING PROCEDURESJohn Musumecihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04779087011271278329noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3359799014847114554.post-43749883448770155542013-01-17T13:02:00.888-05:002013-01-17T13:02:00.888-05:00That was very funny, dead on!That was very funny, dead on!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3359799014847114554.post-57402706063757848302013-01-17T12:01:19.252-05:002013-01-17T12:01:19.252-05:00Illiterate bastards, try spell for starters. More ...Illiterate bastards, try spell for starters. More Job Justification for useless hacks at the D.C.<br /><br />1)Removal from Job as Steward; (e) leaving workers off the stewards' report without good reason,<br /><br />The above violates the Consent Decree. There is never any reason to leave a worker off the Steward Report - period. Is the D.C. not currently evaluating the new electronic system whereby all workers "shall" be recorded each & every day?<br /><br />Was this piece of crap written by Unity Team hold-overs?<br /><br />"*There shall be direct examination of all live witnesses ".......as opposed to Dead Men tell No Lies. Are you people serious, "live" witnesses, what - as opposed to dead ones, those beat, stabbed or thrown off the Throgs Neck Bridge?<br /><br />Former Judge Conboy & ex IRO Conboy's restructuring plan was by design meant to eliminate these things. Yet, the current batch of boobs at the D.C. try to slip this crap back into the rules.<br /><br />More Rules is not the solution. Better vetting of the idiots authoring of this crap, by the D.C. in house legal counsel, the RO & USAO, prior to publication would be wiser.<br /><br />Also, instead of a never-ending barrage of disjointed rules & reg's, they all need to be short, concise and uniform throughout.<br /><br />A stenographic record, really? Who will pay for those services? Who eats the costs associated with production of the record/transcript? Will this follow the State or Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the D.C. Kangaroo Court system written by the uneducated hacks noted above?<br /><br />Afterall, you are effecting a man or womans job and livelyhood and their ability to vest a pension and/or obtain pension credits.<br /><br />Hit delete, start over.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com